The number of houses in Sleman enough consumer demand to be more observant and careful to buy a house in Sleman. More than 700 locations in Sleman existing housing that has been permitted through the IPPT. However, please note the new IPPT an initial license and must be accompanied by other permits, among others siteplan and IMB. Licensing process is the responsibility of housing developers and not the consumer obligations. For the full permissions of housing that has been marked by the publication of IMB for each unit of existing homes.
In accordance with Perbub No. 11 of 2007 on Housing Development, then every developer in the construction of residential housing must meet the following requirements: 1) permit the use of land (IPT) or permit the location (IL); 2) acquisition of land; 3) preparation of environmental documents; 4 ) ratification siteplan; 5) solving the certificate; and 6) building permits (IMB).
From this process, then after getting the IPT / IL developer doing the acquisition of land by disposal of land rights from landowners to developers before the Head of the Land Office or Notary or the Head. Disposal of land rights must be conducted within a period of IPT / IL is given. After the release, the developer did request Hak Guna Bangunan (HGB) until later in the HGB parent on behalf of the developer for all the vastness of land held. With HGB owned, developer siteplan filed for approval in the Office of Public Construction and Housing. Siteplan must meet the provisions stipulated in Perbup Number 18/Per.Bup/A/2005 about building and environmental requirements. If Siteplan been approved, subsequently adjusted to the certificate-solving process that has been approved siteplan authorized officer. Fractional certificate is HGB pengambang behalf. Last mandatory requested building permit (IMB) for each housing unit built.
Home construction is correct if all of the above process has been passed by the developers, so the physical construction of housing is rising IMB per unit after house. While the housing development that preceded the issuance of permits prior to the above to watch out by prospective home buyers. Many cases developers are not responsible for the licensing of housing is done, so it is very harmful to consumers. Many residential consumers that have moved into a house he bought, but do not hold legal permits for the house occupied. There are even those who occupy the house for so many years holds no proof of land ownership (certificate) that bought and held only a receipt of purchase or sale and purchase agreements entered who did not have a strong force of law.
It should be emphasized that housing permits are the responsibility of the developer, so that residential consumers have bought a house in a state of complete and livable legaitas permission. The cases that occurred developers do not finish the permit, which is responsible for his obligations, so that consumers have come to bear. That never happened, in the maintenance of IPT / IL developers do not want to pay his IPPT retribution, so that asking consumers to come to bear, as well as its governance siteplan and IMB, while the developer ran away from responsibility. Could not be contacted and his office no longer exists or closed. With cases like the above, of course, very harmful to consumers, developers, government akbibat act also subject to impact, because people are asking aduannya to the government.
Developers are expected to not only seek profit without regard to the obligations of developers and housing consumer rights that must be met. All matters relating to the completeness of the legality of licensing will actually improve the competitiveness of the housing itself and housing developers in the eyes of consumers. Developers and location of housing that will complete their legality, and ogled the prospective buyers have more selling points. Housing marketing is supposed to be done with honest and candid so that consumers get the housing in accordance with the promotion being offered. Including the legality of the permission process has been and will be related to housing construction, to be submitted to prospective buyers.
To anticipate this, through Perbub 11 Year 2007 as above, article 16, then every developer of residential housing developers must have a certificate issued by the competent authorities and institutions or associations incorporated in the housing developers were valid under laws and regulations. Hopefully, with this requirement, the developer has a moral responsibility to make housing development and marketing with full responsibility. Both the responsibility to the association or to the consumer buyer housing.
In addition to the residential houses, the houses are sold outside persorangan private housing should be considered potential buyers, especially the houses located in the middle of rice fields. It is possible that the houses are standing on the ground rice cultivation, the status field, so that appropriate regulations are not true and it violates the function of conservation. Buildings can only be established on the soil yard and had to get permission to construct a building (MB). Houses have stood on the ground that the yard can be seen in evidence a certificate, that the status of the soil yard and there IMB
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar